Article Contents
Article Contents

# The value does not exist! A motivation for extremal analysis

This material is based upon work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant No. FA9550-18-1-0254).

• Standard mathematical economics studies the production, exchange, and consumption of goods “provided with units of measurement,” as in physics, in order to be enumerated, quantified, added, etc. Therefore, “baskets of goods,” which should describe subsets of goods, are mathematically represented as commodity vectors of a vector space, linear combination of units of goods, evaluated by prices, which are linear numerical functions. Therefore, in this sense, mathematical economics is a branch of physics.

However, economics, and many other domains of life sciences, investigate also what will be called entities, defining elements deprived of units of measure, which thus cannot be enumerated.

(1) Denoting by $X$ the set of entities $x \in X$ deprived of units of measurement, a “basket of goods” is actually a subset $K \subset X$ of the set entities, i.e., an element of the “hyperset” ${\cal{P}}(X)$, the family of subsets of $X$, and no longer a commodity vector of the vector space of commodities;

(3) Entities can still be evaluated by a family of functions $A: x \in X \mapsto A(x) \in \mathbb{R}$ regarded as a “valuators,” in lieu and place of linear “prices” evaluating the units of economic goods.

(4) Subsets of entities can be evaluated by an “interval of valuesbetween two extremal ones, the minimum and the maximum, instead of the sum of values of units of goods weighted by their quantities.

Life sciences dealing with intertwined relations among many combinations of entities, hypersets offer metaphors of “Lamarckian complexity” that keeps us away from binary relations, graphs of functions, and set-valued maps, to focus our attention on “multinary relations” between families of hypersets. Even deprived of units of measurement, these “proletarian” entities still enjoy enough properties for this pauperization to be mathematically consistent.

This is the object of this extremal manifesto: in economics and other domains of life sciences, vector spaces should yield their imperial status of “state space” to hypersets and linear prices to hypervaluators.

We no longer have to add goods which can only be gathered, prices do not have to be linear, although it costs some effort to deprive oneself of the powerful and luxurious charms of convex and linear functional analysis motivated by physics.

These sacrifices concern only economics and other fields of life science, since physicists deal with experimental observations of objects endowed with unit of measurement by adequate processes of measurement. They can happily live in vector spaces without any guilt. This is not the case of life scientists, who have mainly history to support and validate their observations, with, sometimes, the privilege to statistically measure the frequency of some of them.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 03E75, 28A15, 47L07.

 Citation:

•  [1] Akian, M., Gaubert, S. and Kolokoltsov, V., Set coverings and invertibility of functional Galois connections, In: Litvinov, G. L. and Maslov, V. P. (eds.), Idempotent Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, American Mathematical Society, Washington DC, USA, 2005, 19-51. [2] Aubin, J.-P., Mutational and Morphological Analysis: Tools for Shape Regulation and Morphogenesis, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2000. [3] Aubin, J.-P., Bayen, A. and Saint-Pierre, P., Viability Theory: New Directions, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. [4] Aubin, J.-P. and Cellina, A., Differential Inclusions: Set-Valued Maps and Differential Inclusions, Springer-Verlag, 1984. [5] Aubin, J.-P. and Dordan, O., A survey on Galois stratifications and measures of viability risk, Journal of Convex Analysis, 2016, 23(1): 181−225. [6] Aubin, J.-P. and Frankowska, H., Trajectoires lourdes de systèmes contrôlés, Comptes-Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, PARIS, 1984, 298: 521−524. [7] Aubin, J.-P. and Frankowska, H., Heavy viable trajectories of controlled systems, Annales de l’Institut Henri-Poincaré C, Analyse Non Linéaire, 1985, 5(2): 371−395. [8] Aubin, J.-P. and Frankowska, H., Set-Valued Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1990. [9] Aubin, J.-P. and Frankowska, H., The viability kernel algorithm for computing value functions of infinite horizon optimal control problems, J. Math. Analysis and Applications, 1996, 201(2): 555−576.doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0273. [10] Aubin-Frankowski, P.-C., Interpreting the dual Riccati equation through the LQ reproducing kernel, Comptes Rendus Mathématique, 2021, 359(2): 199−204. [11] Aubin-Frankowski, P.-C. and Bensoussan, A., Operator-valued kernels and control of infinite dimensional dynamic systems, Control and Decision Conference (CDC), Cancún, Mexico, 2022. [12] Aubin-Frankowski, P.-C., and Gaubert, S., Tropical reproducing kernels and optimization, 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11410. [13] Bensoussan, A. and Lions, J.-L., Contrôle Impulsionnel et Inéquations Quasi-Variationnelles, Dunod, 1982. [14] Bensoussan, A., Stochastic Control by Functional Analysis Methods, North-Holland, 1982. [15] Berge, C., Espaces Topologiques et Fonctions Multivoques, Dunod, 1959. [16] Céa, J., Optimisation: Théorie et Algorithmes, Dunod, 1971. [17] Delfour, M. and Zolésio, J.-P., Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus and Optimization, SIAM series in Advances in Design and Control, Philadelphia, 2001. [18] Lorenz, T., Mutational Analysis: A Joint Framework for Cauchy Problems in and beyond Vector Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. [19] Rockafellar, R. T. and Wets, R., Variational Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1997.